UM. I AM NOT PRO AMERICAN, PRO ANGLO AT ALL Um. Don’t leap to the conclusion tha

UM. I AM NOT PRO AMERICAN, PRO ANGLO AT ALL

Um. Don’t leap to the conclusion that I’m pro american. I’m pretty anti-anglo all around. I’m pro american post-hoc law and entrepreneurialism, and pro-american and russian militarism. I’m pro anglo empiricism. I’m pro german almost everything else. And I’m pro dutch and scandinavian genetics. And I’m pro the source of western civilization’s exceptionalism: aggressive self domestication (Paternalism), individual sovereignty, rule of natural law of reciprocity, and markets in everything.I’m not pro anglo, or pro-american, as much as pro western civilization’s ability to rapidly evolve compared to all other civilizations.

I’m anti ignorance, error, bias, wishful-thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, propaganda, and deceit, because they impede the west’s ability to drag humanity kicking and screaming into godhood.

In the choice between middle eastern dysgenic globalism, and east asian and western eugenic nationalism, the choice is very clear.

Diversity is a bad because it does not force families, clans, tribes and nations to pay the cost of their domestication, and instead exteralizes that cost and devolves host populations permanently through genetic cultural and institutional damages.

I am not a white nationalist in the sense that I am perfectly happy to cut our population to the bone to rid ourselves of the undomesticated of our own. And putting those feeble genes to work improving those further behind.

Let a thousand nations bloom. Small homogenous states with professional warriors, citizen militias and a few nukes are all but invulnerable.