YOUR METHOD OF FREE ASSOCIATION VS YOUR METHOD OF ARGUMENT One can freely associ

YOUR METHOD OF FREE ASSOCIATION VS YOUR METHOD OF ARGUMENT

One can freely associate by any means that works for him. And one can falsify (test his ideas) by the means available to him. But arguments are different things. If you argue in a lower precision higher context language against a higher precision lower context language, you are either incompetent for the argument or dishonest. My problem is that I find almost everyone is dishonest by way of wishful thinking due to overinvestment in higher context, lower precision, method of argument, that was easier to learn but generally did more harm than good. In other words, every theologian, philosopher, occult literature, moral essay literature, or pseudoscientific literature that fills the need given the limited ability of the individual when he starts his investigation.