You and Yours didn’t seek exchanges under rule of law, under the american constitution as a document of rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity – you sought majoritarianism. Rule by discretion (authority). Whether that authority by one, some, or majority is irrelevant.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 13:59:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218170985737785345
Reply addressees: @KralcTrebor @ARossP @tedcruz @RandPaul @MittRomney @SenatorCollins @lisamurkowski @SenMcSallyAZ @SenMikeLee @johnthune @SenatorWicker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218170548645191680
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KralcTrebor @ARossP @tedcruz @RandPaul @MittRomney @SenatorCollins @lisamurkowski @SenMcSallyAZ @SenMikeLee @johnthune @SenatorWicker Rule of Law = Rule of non-discretion, and rule of non-discretion limits us to voluntary reciprocity. You’re lying by pretending majoritarian dictates are rule of law. They aren’t. Our ancestors spent thousands of years developing rule-of-law rather than rule-by-discretion (man).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1218170548645191680
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KralcTrebor @ARossP @tedcruz @RandPaul @MittRomney @SenatorCollins @lisamurkowski @SenMcSallyAZ @SenMikeLee @johnthune @SenatorWicker Rule of Law = Rule of non-discretion, and rule of non-discretion limits us to voluntary reciprocity. You’re lying by pretending majoritarian dictates are rule of law. They aren’t. Our ancestors spent thousands of years developing rule-of-law rather than rule-by-discretion (man).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1218170548645191680
Leave a Reply