SOLUTION: THE TRIPARTITE MARKET FOR ARCHETYPES Alexander(Achilles Warrior), Faus

SOLUTION: THE TRIPARTITE MARKET FOR ARCHETYPES

Alexander(Achilles Warrior), Faust(Blacksmith), and Jesus(Slave)

That’s it you know. Force, Trade, and Gossip: Achilles the Warrior, The Blacksmith, Jesus the Slave. (And for those of you who don’t know, the oldest western fairy tale is the devil and the blacksmith, which you all think of in its modern construction as faust. And it is not western man who is faustian, but the people who have the agency to: the cult of the craftsmen – the middle. Whereas the aristocracy does not learn from the blacksmith, but from Achilles. Whereas the underclass and women do not learn from either but from Jesus. And where all of us can understand each other by understanding each.

So when I tell people I am restoring markets in everything by ending monopoly in thought, including ideal truth, ideal types, ideal persons, ideal classes, Ideal political orders, and ideal myths, the solution to religion is to find those myths. The myths that we compete with between the upper aristocratic, the middle practitioner, and the lower class serfs and slaves. The myths that represent the power of each: force to push, trade to exchange, and gossip and rallying the resistance.

So the mythology of ancient west was aristocratic: achilles and the law. The mythology of the near east was that of slaves. The works of the church are those of Jesus. And the works of literature that we call the western canon was written by the middle class and the stoics.

So we have three class literatures: The aristocracy of force (folly/arrogance), the literature of bargain and cooperation (folly/greed), the literature of submission resistance(folly/pride).

The only problem is, that our literature of resistance is constructed from lies using the technology of abrahamism: fictionalism.

Yet, as Jefferson demonstrated, the life, works, and words of jesus – his ordeal – can be separated from the abrahamism that was bounded by it. Philosophy is still bound by Platonism. As is moral and political discourse in general. Which is something I think I have fixed with propertarianism.

So starting with three archetypes, I’m going to try to produce the same literary analysis that I have produced with the tripartite methods of coercion and the resulting class structures.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine