Well, there are teachers and there are judges, there are scientists and there ar

Well, there are teachers and there are judges, there are scientists and there are prosecutors. And my view is that it is the competition between the via positiva (peterson) and the via negativa (law) that leaves truth remaining. Because we do not know the truth, we can never know it. We can only know what is false and not yet false. As such, it is up to some to imagine and others to falsify. And for everyone in the market for knowledge to participate in the game. This is contrary to our intuitions because we want the cheap route to truth. But there is no other way to calculate it than by trial and error. And therefore no way to improve our pursuit of it other than to prohibit falsehoods. I don’t know any substantial thinkers that are accessible. It is up to followers and advocates to make the inaccessible accessible.

In my opinion people will understand the constitution and what they will obtain in exchange for the cost of it. They will understand the value of truth even at the expense of the burden of it. But I doubt many people will understand the rest, or need to, other than the judges who use it to administer the law, and those legislators and lawyers who which to construct contracts of the commons that we currently call ‘legislation and regulation’.

All along our mission has been the same: I am not a populist. I am providing the answer to Abraham, Augustine, Kant, Marx, Derrida and Rorty. Continuing the work of Aristotle, The Stoics, Roman Law, Machiavelli, Bacon, Smith, Hume, Darwin, Menger, Poincare, Weber, Pareto, Popper and Hayek.

It is up to men of good conscience to be the distributors. I’m just the manufacturer.