“ARISTOCRACY IS TO POLITY WHAT CAPITALISM IS TO ECONOMY” (brilliant) by Simon St

“ARISTOCRACY IS TO POLITY WHAT CAPITALISM IS TO ECONOMY”

(brilliant)

by Simon Ström

I disagree with the premise that democratic elections are a market for the best government, and it’s demonstrably untrue unless you believe “real” democracy has yet to be implemented. The theory behind democracies’ producing bad government should be something along the lines that it fixes the weight of suffrage in polity equivalent to a severe price control regime in economy (“communism”), to the detriment of entrepreneurship and economic competitiveness.

In aristocracy, there is no suffrage except when peers or parties (classes) broker deals between them, and at those times suffrage is by no means fixed to equal per individual, but determined according to the market value of each respective parties’ potential of cooperation, boycott or violence; either ad hoc (gathering of a thing/political marketplace to address a particular issue) or by convention (multi-house parliament/estates). This is the polity equivalent of free-market economy.

CURT: Clarifying terms:

ARISTOCRACY: Aristocratic production of COMMONS(meaning government) and RULE by Rule of law by Natural Law by an independent judiciary (a cult of law).

We conflate Rule(via negativa) and Government(via positiva), Just as the Abrahamists conflate Truth, Law and History with Wisdom, Command and Myth. Truth requires deflation.