THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EFFEMINACY AND ROTHBARDIANISM What libertarians hold to

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EFFEMINACY AND ROTHBARDIANISM

What libertarians hold to is that each is the judge of morality rather than external conditions that determine it regardless of what they think.

What they are doing and what is appealing to ‘libertarians’ (whether it is a genetic, developmental, or cognitive deficiency – I assume that like in my case it is an erroneous dependence on introspection) is to ***apply the feminine strategy of demanding her approval rather than preventing the conflict between men.***

It took me a long time to understand this was the cause. And I didn’t like it because it is my intuition as well, but once I understood that ***we care about women’s cooperation so that we buy opportunities for sex and affection, and to prevent their gossip. But no one gives a damn about the approval of beta males, and their gossip, so it just doesn’t matter what beta males think. Men don’t seek approval of other men, they seek to avoid the retaliation of other men.***

I could write a book on this subject. Haidt has the data. The data is obvious. All we would need to do is some genetic testing on self identified libertarians. And we would find very consistent results.

There is a very great difference between granting one another sovereignty and reciprocal defense out of loyalty, and running around virtue signaling that one is unwilling to cooperate except on x terms without providing reciprocal insurance (loyalty).

From this perspective it’s extremely easy to understand the evolutionary biology at work.

I have avoided this particular line of investigation and argument because I feel it is destructive to common interests. So I prefer to deny libertarians the fantasy that they can possess liberty without fighting and reciprocal insurance via loyalty.

I had hoped to merely end libertarianism by demonstrating the fallacies of mises, rothbard and hoppe as mere word games, and that the dreams of a property-commune were just as absurd as the dreams of a commons-commune.

But the science is sitting out there. And the evidence is everywhere. So if I have to go out and emasculate the libertarian movement further I will.

At present I prefer to just say “look guys, I understand, its impossible so support the warrior class and understand that you are gonna have to either operate at their grace, or at least stay out of their way. Because they will create sovereignty under which you can have your liberty. But without them creating sovereignty, you cannot possible ever again have your liberty. because there are no borderlands left.”

There is only one source of liberty: a universal, armed, organized, militiia demanding it from a sovereign in exchange for compensation.

There is only one source of sovereignty, and that is a universal, armed, organized, militia, imposing rule of law, under natural law, universal standing, and universal application, producing markets for reproduction(marriage), production(goods, services, and information), commons, and polities, wherein each man fully insures each other man and his property in toto from imposition of costs.