HARRIS VS PETERSON IN INTELLIGENCE I would like say something politically incorr

HARRIS VS PETERSON IN INTELLIGENCE

I would like say something politically incorrect, so if you’ll forgive me I’ll suggest this: is that peterson is a pretty common northern european demonstrating pretty common northern european modeling skills and ‘awareness of the pack’ – or european ‘formation-thought’, whereas Harris is a pretty common ashkenazi demonstrating pretty common verbal and personal awareness skills. And that two people with relatively similar degrees of intelligence (just as in men and women) will tend to master those forms of inquiry and analysis with which they are genetically dominant. There is a reason for example for the distribution of northern european directors and jewish writers. Just as there is a reason for the distribution of east asian engineers and ashkenazi lawyers. And there is a good reason for the asymmetric distribution of western artists and the near absence of ashkenazi arts. Just as, at least in the personality trait of openness (intellectual curiosity) women favor aesthetics and men favor ideas. If you examine the traits of different peoples around the world, most of our differences are reducible to (a) the degree of Neotonic (paedomorphic) selection (domestication), and (b) the distribution of what we consider gender traits between the genders.