YES. I BAIT YOU INTO LEARNING OR TEACHING… I say something controversial, some

YES. I BAIT YOU INTO LEARNING OR TEACHING…

I say something controversial, something offensive, or something that’s a half truth.

The purpose of doing so is to attract ‘those who understand a half truth’, then bait people into correcting me (or using suggestion to correct them by inserting doubt), so that I can make a point:

that the (a) abrahamic tradition is predatory, and

(b) that intellectuals who lack power, attempt to seize it (obtain status signals) by deception, using this technique REGARDLESS OF THEIR GENETIC ORIGINS.

Men seek to advance status (climb a dominance hierarchy) by any RATIONAL MEANS AVAILABLE TO THEM, and lying (abrahamism) is an exceptional technique for that deception, just as western truth telling is its opposite.

If I wrote about propertarianism the way *I* think, no one would know about it at all. The price of getting criticism is that I’m entertaining by advancing my work from the position of an extremist.

Long time followers know I use these techniques. I attack things or promote things in order to create conflict and interest in order to provide solutions that if stated simply would be overlooked, because the knowledge required to comprehend them requires an essay, whereas in this technique it requires an argument that people can get involved in.

Create controversy to draw interest, then solve the controversy by leading the horse to water.) Exactly what every talking head show on television does all day long…..