Struggling with Eli’s suggestion that we should (I should) be less accommodating

Struggling with Eli’s suggestion that we should (I should) be less accommodating (kind, considerate) of those with less agency, because they will always, to some degree, be the enemy.

My view is, that in the search for, and production of, fellow sovereigns, there is no order other than Natural Law’s markets-in-everything, that will allow us to filter (cull), breed (domesticate), train (educate), test (through markets), identify candidates (sovereigns), evolve the animals (human or otherwise), accumulate (capital in all its forms) and defeat the universe (transcend), and do so at a profit (tax, technology, competitive utility).

I do not think that this argument is defeatable without at the same time saying we lack the ability and therefore agency to possess sovereignty, and transcend.

So this then is my criticism of my fellows who desire aristocracy. Either we are able or unable – testably – to do such a thing.

They have, in one century, demonstrated their folly – and the severe consequences for our civilization, our kin, our nations, our race. They have ignored that migrations cause ignorance, dark ages, civilization-cide, and genocide. And they ignore that only western civilization has dragged man out of ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, and tyranny. And we have failed to be honest in stating that the method was through the forcible domestication of man and woman like we domesticated plants and animals before them.

Pandora is the root of all evils. It is the violence of men to suppress her and her impulses, men and their impulses, that produces civilization and transcendence.

We let pandora free. Time again to box her. Along with the host of lies.