“Your writing style is getting better, Curt.”—Aleister Vandal Thank you 😉 Um.

—“Your writing style is getting better, Curt.”—Aleister Vandal

Thank you 😉

Um. FYI: (a) I have always been able to write empathically, and persuasively. It was hard to learn to argue ‘scientifically’. Just as it is hard for most libertarians and conservatives to argue ‘scientifically’ because the langauge simply didn’t exist to do so.

(b) it helps when you finally understand the subject, develop terminology, and can relate those terms for others. That’s why I work at all these lists (series/sequences) and definitions, and operational language.

(c) Long time followers know I experiment a lot in my posts. Most posts are sketches of proofs. meaning: can I construct an argument. I try to construct proofs tens or dozens of times. Most are incomplete. It is by constructing those ‘difficult to read’ proofs that I can create these more ‘readable’ and ’empathic’ statements of greater clarity. I learned a long time ago that people like ‘watching’ that process. But that it also confuses those who don’t know what process is in process so to speak.

Why am I saying this?

Because it does bother me a bit when people don’t understand what I’m doing. I have to invent a language and grammar for arguing in favor of our ancient group evolutionary strategy: the philosophy of western civilization.

-hugs man. 😉