PREFACE: In my view all people can be domesticated by the common natural law if

PREFACE: In my view all people can be domesticated by the common natural law if that law provides sufficient suppression of innovative means of parasitism. And that our philosohpers and scientists failed to develop that method of legal suppression for a variety of reasons – most of which had to do with incentives at the time.

JEWISH PERSECUTION WORLDWIDE

Sol – the problem for jews is that they want to preserve their separatism and avoid contributing to the host commons, and instead, to live parasitically off it. This is the same strategy as the gypsies but at a much more indirect method. To do this the jews have made a habit of working with the central government against the interests of the people. The fact that this service could not be provided until the templars, and that the templars were crushed by it, left open an opportunity for the jews to seize that function in society as it emerged. Both the church and the Nobility thought it ‘dirty’ work.

The problem is, that eventually, a shock occurs, and the people who have contact with what they see as licensed predators (sort of how we see the IRS and Collection Agencies today), take out their anger and steal the property of those who have allied with the state against them. (Just as the jews have done in this country).

i can’t remember the name of the book. I should but I always forget it. But it’s written by a jew, and he recommends that jews end this cycle of parasitism and alliance with the states against the people, and realize that they are not so much victims but deserving of what has happened to them – it’s a problem of their own making.

This is my position as well. The jewish group evolutionary strategy is successful, but it has lead to a specialization in literacy, and a weakness in numbers, and physicality. Sot hat the jewish people require host civilizations to provide the protection of property while they engage in profitable but continuously antagonizing extractions from the people and their commons. Israel is an interesting experiment because it will demonstrate whether jews can convert from parasitic consumption of commons, to the expensive production of commons. If so, judaism will start looking a lot like presbyterianism.

Separate but among cannot work unless one pays heavily into the commons. But jews choose primarily those occupations that are not productive and parasitically consume the commons – those that make use of asymmetric information.

(in other words, having a lot of jewish doctors, physical scientists, and accountants is one thing, but having a lot of jewish bankers, financiers, advertisers, marketers, public intellectuals, artists, propagandists, lawyers, politicians, is a very bad thing because it creates too great a hazard (as we can see from Mr Krugman) such that the cognitive bias favor of creating additional hazards but escaping accountability for them, can be sated in the course of one’s duties. Without the law to take away the benefit-of the doubt, we cannot ‘train’ their cult to behave as high trust individuals in a high trust society – in great numbers.

I dunno. I am pretty fond of reformed jews and I don’t see much of a difference between them and our classical liberal bourgeoisie except for our western predilection for (masculine) contribution to the ACCUMULATIVE commons and the jewish (female) predilection for contribution to the CONSUMPTIVE commons.

All people can be domesticated by sufficient law constructed to take advantage of incentives to prosecute parasitic behavior.