We don’t vote for our identities. we vote for our parties. we have two parties.

We don’t vote for our identities. we vote for our parties. we have two parties. we have two parties by design. the multi-party system seems to have been a better choice. the prime-minister/monarch seems to have been a better choice. however, in practice (universally) a majority and an opposition party seem to form that roughly reflect the feminine (dysgenic female) and masculine (eugenic male) reproductive strategies.

This is the empirical revision of the Iron Law of Oligarchy: (a) oligarchies will form, (b) they will form into a major and an opposition party (c) they will pursue either feminine/dysgenic vs masculine/eugenic, and whether they use Authoritarian or Majoritarian ‘excuses’ will depend upon the homogeneity of the population.

the left = feminine, consumptive, dysgenic equalitarian. the right = masculine, accumulative, eugenic meritocracy.

The rest is just excuses and verbal nonsense to claim status signals by promoting differences without distinctions.