THE LABEL CHANGED. BUT THE NEW RIGHT REMAINS —[Cernovich] is also a pathologic

THE LABEL CHANGED. BUT THE NEW RIGHT REMAINS

—[Cernovich] is also a pathological liar.– anon..

No. That criticism doesn’t stand.

The alt-right was changed from a self identifying label for all reactionaries, to a left-label for WN using Spencer in short order. Just as the left intended.

That’s why (Me), Cernovich, and PJW, switched to ‘New Right’. To separate from the third rail. I started more than a year ago because I saw it coming. But this year, as it became obvious, people migrated. And we needed that name to stick. Because our enemy is not just the left, but the establishment ‘old right’.

Compared to the Alt’s, The “New Right” works on advancing the good rather than criticizing the bad. This technique is always superior. Arguing agaist something is not he same as arguing for something. Arguing for specific policy (rule of law) is even better. But in truth, we must argue using ALL methods, since people obtain sentimental meaning from the arguments that they understand. It takes more knowledge to argue for something, and more knowledge to argue for a specific set of institutional changes, but we all ‘feel’ and will act in favor of what we can understand.

And so ALL OF US had to deal with this change in label given the Spencer-division. Mike isn’t unique, and punching right on nonsense isn’t helpful.

Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now:

Spencer is working on WN, (wn)

The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt)

RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt)

PJW is working on media criticism. (new)

Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there)

Mike is working “within the system” (new)

I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new)

This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals.

And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments.

The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions.

THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION.

We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your beleive in what can be accomplished. Some wthin the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail).

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine

( Mike Cernovich, Richard Spencer, The RAMZPAUL Show, Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson, Eli Harman )