LIBERTINISM REQUIRES FAITH and FRAUD. Faith in the impossible is not an argument

LIBERTINISM REQUIRES FAITH and FRAUD.

Faith in the impossible is not an argument. The question is whether anarchy (the limit of rule of law to physical property) can produce a polity that can survive competition in the market for polities.

(a) all historical evidence is to the contrary.

(b) a praxeological construction of such a polity is impossible.

Hence why there is only one possible means of obtaining a condition of liberty (permission for private property), which is:

(a) reciprocal sovereignty for property in toto

(b) natural judge discovered common law of property in toto

(c) and the only methods of organization possible under sovereignty, natural law, and property in toto: markets in all aspects of life.

(d) and therefore markets for association, cooperation, for reproduction, for the evolution of specialized portfolios of production, distribution and trade, for the production of commons, and the production of polities that produce specialized portfolios of commons.

All other claims for anarchy are deducible to the following:

(a) parasitism (theft) upon the commons produced by others.

Period. End of argument. No further argument other than lie, fraud, error, or faith is possible.

Faith, like lie, and fraud, is incompatible with reason, science, truth, and therefore incompatible with argument. Error is however compatible with argument. We are all victims of ignorance and error. Ignorance and error are not a choice.

Faith is a choice.

CCM chooses faith in order to justify his error and deceit, in order to justify his fraud, in order to justify his attempt to exist parasitically upon the productivity of others that is invested in the commons, since commons produce multipliers.

Q.E.D. Thus endeth the lesson.

Curt Doolittle

The Philosophy of Aristocracy

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine.

(PS: yes I just called CCM, like all libertines, a liar, a fraud, and a thief.)