“Identity politics mixed with a notion of universal tolerance renders preferenti

—“Identity politics mixed with a notion of universal tolerance renders preferential ethic/moral propositions and normative means of decidability ineffective, therefore resorting to Law to accomplish their goals.

I say law opposed to natural law, as the natural law would eventually restore normative and preferential in group methods (because it focusses on reciprocity and property in toto – property in toto includes social portfolios of groups – thus would protect the preferential and normative methods).

Therefore identitarians must seek legislation or regulation as a means to accomplish their ends. The natural law would prevent their ends – ends which necessitate the destruction of social commons of other groups.

If they accomplish the destruction of the “dominant culture”, destruction of each other (each “oppressed” group) would be a natural consequence.

Natural Law stands as a last resort when preferential and normative means fails and stands as the default method across disparate groups who do not share or do not have enough overlap of preferential and normative means.

Natural law provides commensurability between disparate groups.

Legislation/regulation provides a method of destroying disparate groups – a means of predation(at worst) and parasitism (at best). “—Bill Joslin