PHILOSOPHICAL MEANING, MEMORY, AND DECIDABILITY CAN BE CONVEYED BY: The spectrum

PHILOSOPHICAL MEANING, MEMORY, AND DECIDABILITY CAN BE CONVEYED BY:

The spectrum from:

the scientific, to

the logical, to

the rational, to

the moral, to

the historical, to

the literary, to

the mythical, to

the religious, to

the occult, to

the new age, to

the dream-state.

as:

decreasing information,

decreasing precision of decidability,

increasing scope (more general rule), and

ease of memory (remembering), and

increasing dependence upon introspection and experience.

from the Objective Calculative <—- to —–> the Subjective Intuitive.

Because that’s what humans CAN do.

And therefor it is what they MUST do.

Narrative structures of all kinds assist in memory formation.

Emotional loading and framing assists in memory formation.

Spirituality (elation from the pack response) assists in memory formation.

CAN you portray the same messages at each increasingly substitutive (associative) and decreasingly objective (pure) stage of transition? Sure. It’s an art. It’s the difference between science and poetry. What’s the difference? Meaning is harder to convey and retain without the subjective associations. And error, bias, and wishful thinking are harder to prevent because of the subjective associations.

Ergo, any COMPLETE and DURABLE, INTER-GENERATIONALLY TRANSFERRABLE philosophical system of decidability requires restatement in division of the spectrum from the objective and calculative, to the subjective and intuitionistic.

If for no other reason than childhood narrative pedagogy is more influential than late age calculative knowledge.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine