WHETHER WE CALL IT INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY OR MARKET FASCISM, IS A JUST A TAUTOLO

WHETHER WE CALL IT INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY OR MARKET FASCISM, IS A JUST A TAUTOLOGY – SAYING THE SAME THING FROM TWO POINTS OF VIEW.

As an individual I might prefer sovereignty and creativity, or i might prefer liberty and prosperity, or I might prefer freedom and choice, or I might prefer subsidy in exchange for maintaining the physical and normative commons.

But those wants are all the result of the use of sovereignty as the ultimate criteria of decidability, and by consequence the requirement for markets in every walk of life.

Including the market for subsidy in exchange for the maintenance of the commons.

It’s the subsidized that maintain the garden. Those that possess freedom and liberty that enjoy it, and the aristocracy that causes it.

We either use violence to create sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy, or we let others use violence to enslave us.

There is no alternative.