CHOOSE: LARGE CASTE, SMALL NATION
As South America, Islamic Civilization, Indian Civilization, and the Roman Empire demonstrated, there is no ‘uniformity’ or equality possible thru inbreeding. We either divide into nation-states or we divide into castes.
So we can only choose the to distribute hierarchies and underclasses across many small states with possible rotations, or concentrate them in an inescapable caste-trap in large states.
This is effectively law of nature that humans would have to act against their personal and reproductive interests to change.
For the simple reasons that (a) some races have been more successful at morphological evolution through paedomorphic mating, (b) we are unequally desirable as mates, friends, partners, allies, and leaders, because of degrees of paedomorphic evolution and eugenic culling of the underclasses, and (c) we demonstrate both kin selection(more male) and hypergamy(more female) mating preferences.
So we can choose castes or nations. And the evidence is in: Many small nations are superior at producing relative equality.
That this is both obvious and logical is in itself a criticism of our tendency to seek safety in numbers even when it is against our interests, and to imagine commonality of thought and interest where it does not and cannot exist.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-16 08:34:00 UTC
Leave a Reply