Deceiving, negotiating, justifying, testifying, and criticizing are different activities. Right?
When we engage in negotiating with enemies, negotiating with customers, with family, with judge and jury, with fellow scientists are we using the same truth criteria?
We live lives of negotiation not argument, persuasion not truth, excuse-making not survival from criticism.
But in the end what does argumentative epistemology tell us about property?
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-09 21:22:00 UTC
Leave a Reply