“Curt: Can we then say that your philosophy is both Chicago and Austrian?”— GR

—“Curt: Can we then say that your philosophy is both Chicago and Austrian?”—

GREAT QUESTION

I have no problem with discretion in fiscal policy, rule of law in monetary, infrastructure, and trade policy, and social science in institutional and human capital policy.

It’s when economists try to conflate any of those by misapplying them outside of the knowledge required to truthfully appeal for moral license to act upon opportunities that I have a problem.

In other words, if it’s true and voluntary that’s fine. If it’s not true and voluntary then it isn’t.

My objective is truth in the pursuit of voluntary cooperation through exchanges. And to overthrow the pseudoscientific era of aggregations for the purpose of conducting fraud.

Thanks