(Nit: terminological advice in argumentation: Avoid “true” and “pure” and “real”

(Nit: terminological advice in argumentation: Avoid “true” and “pure” and “real” – all are “no true Scotsman” arguments that belie lack of understanding of causality. Some choices: “equalitarian democracy”, “majoritarian democracy”, “monpoly democracy”, or some other variation that describes the cause as the use of equal votes yet unequal distribution of interests and ability in the population. The original English model granted a house for each class monarchy, nobility, middle class, and the church as an agent for women and the poor. this allowed us to create a market for the construction of commons between the classes rather than democracy. the error in the classical liberal model was in emerging middle class concentrating power in the parliament rather than continuing the model and expanding the parliament rather than adding new houses. This culminated in the enfranchisement of labor, then women, which if in separate houses would have preserved the use of government as a market, rather than as a ruling body. – Cheers )