Q&A: “Curt, whats wrong with Popper?” First, Testimonialism is largely a complet

Q&A: “Curt, whats wrong with Popper?”

First, Testimonialism is largely a completion of Popper’s Critical Rationalism project. And I credit Popper and Hayek for attempting to convert social science to an information model, just as we have converted the physical sciences to using information as the model.

So you know, I criticize Hoppe, Mises, Rothbard, Popper, and Hayek, Poincare, Bridgman and Brouwer. But my work is based upon the contributions of all of them. So my criticism is an attempt at correction.

Second, when I criticize popper, it’s more that I’m criticizing his rather Utopian work the Open Society, which is the inspiration for Soros’ agenda of creating (a) a safe place for his kin (b) by converting from national rule of law, to universal rule of finance.

Apparently forgetting along the way that universalism is only in the interests of the lower classes – who do very little. And against the domestication of man by those who do very much.

So, in the end, when I criticize popper i’m largely criticizing Soros. Because Soros is what you get if you rely upon the Open Society.