JONES AND JOHN MACAFEE. ITS NOT THE REPUBLICANS THAT ARE TAKING OVER THE LIBERTA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icfiOdFcmUsALEX JONES AND JOHN MACAFEE. ITS NOT THE REPUBLICANS THAT ARE TAKING OVER THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY – ITS THE TRADITIONAL RIGHT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icfiOdFcmUs

—–

Dear ALEX and JOHN:

Republicans taking over the Libertarian Party? No.

The New Right, which unifies classical liberal libertarians, classical liberal conservatives, and Traditionalists is taking over the Republican and Libertarian parties, and absorbing the white middle class from the Democratic party. It is an emerging party of traditional norms.

What you see is the libertine libertarians (a demonstrably marginal group) being abandoned by the emerging New Right consensus.

Why? Because the ‘libertine libertarian’ project has been a demonstrated failure. And because ‘movement conservatism’ has been a demonstrated failure.

Liberty CAN ONLY BE obtained by and held by the organized application of violence in order to enforce rule of law, under natural law – the law of property and sovereignty over it.

But the libertine/libertarian program sought to avoid the payment for construction of normative institutional, and formal commons – and not to obtain liberty. It was a theory of inverted communism in where all property is a common – but instead desiring that no property is common. But the problem is, the west achieved liberty through the construction of commons: truth telling, jury, Judge, Natural Law, Universal Standing, Rule of Law, Common Judge Discovered Law, Martial Service, the Civic Commons (voluntary).

So libertine libertarianism is a failed, and dead strategy. Just as dead as movement conservatism, neo-conservatism, neo-liberalism. The mixed economy is necessary to compete against other economies given demographic and geographic and institutional differences between groups. Commons are necessary since rule of law and private property and a condition of liberty are produced as commons.

All organizations are formed to pursue a strategy in the interest of members. All organizations grow to the point where the rents sought by members leave the organization unable to produce new incentives in response to significant change, or shocks.

Our nation has experience the accumulation of changes and shocks caused by the attempt of the 20th century public intellectuals to assume that they could abandon hard money, rule of law, intergenerational lending, and the nuclear family, while at the same time importing vast numbers of the underclass at a time when marginal differences in productivity held by the west for 500 years are no longer a normative, institutional, and physical asset.

Curt Doolittle

The Philosophy of Aristocracy

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine

( PS: Yes, Gary is a nice man. He is also a weak man. )