Which is how he skates the issue, that it’s not just race but race(species), subrace(race), neoteny (enabling agency), bias in cognitive dimorphism (male vs female), and class size (success at domestication). The data is obvious. Its making abrahamic lies impossible that’s hard.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 01:53:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210740441315852294
Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer @C_Kavanagh @jumbojs @BenWinegard @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210356392051138560
IN REPLY TO:
@Steve_Sailer
@C_Kavanagh @jumbojs @BenWinegard @nathancofnas Of course, it turns out that Harvard geneticist David Reich generally uses traditional racial categories to talk about modern populations. For example, here he endorses Blumenbach’s 18th century idea of the Caucasian race:
https://t.co/npTohjybqn https://t.co/gXb7sYuh1w
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210356392051138560
Leave a Reply