BUT SINCE YOU GAVE ME AN EXCUSE TO RIDICULE ARGUMENTATION ETHICS I HAVE TO SEIZE

BUT SINCE YOU GAVE ME AN EXCUSE TO RIDICULE ARGUMENTATION ETHICS I HAVE TO SEIZE IT.

Argumentation ethics relies on the weapon of contradiction. This mighty weapon works precisely nowhere except in a court where property is based upon high trust moral constraint that is itself impossible under rothbardian ethics. (That is a lovely contradiction.)

Argumentation ethics are nonsense. Property rights exist as a property of contractual relations. In the absence of contractual relations, violence is our greatest competitive asset. Libertarians (Libertines) attempt to escape the high cost of using violence. They do this for a variety of reasons. FOr self congratualtory imaginary status. To escape their powerless inferiority. To avoid the cost of policing using violence. To avoid the risk of applying violence. In other words, libertines conduct a fraud – free riding by fraud.

Certainly progressives don’t care about argumentation. Certainly conservatives advance and use violence. But just like libertines, progressives attempt to free ride. TO gain status over their superiors who make their privileges possible by the organized use of violence.

Under Propertarian ethics and Aristocratic Egalitarianism, the use of violence to actively suppress, institute property rights throughout the scale, and demand truth-speaking, is a defensive, moral and wise, activity.

And right now, WE NEED TO START USING ORGANIZED VIOLENCE TO SAVE OUR PEOPLE