Reading Skye Stewart’s entries in Critical Rationalism and thinking more about p

Reading Skye Stewart’s entries in Critical Rationalism and thinking more about positioning popper and his philosophy in the context of truth-speaking (Given his cosmopolitanism). And I am getting closer to being able to articulate that he is telling us how we can investigate in order to overcome our biases in the process of investigation, and less how we can speak truthfully.

The reason I want to clarify this is to find some way of articulating that what he’s NOT articulating is that we are forever increasing our precision, not that we are increasing our truth content.

I have to work on this idea further. But I get the basic problem. It’s just ‘how do you talk about it?”