CRITICISM OF ANGLO UNIVERSALISTS – THE BURKEIAN FAILURE
–“German-American vs Anglo-American presidents?”–.
Examples:
1) The German-Texan Eisenhower (Eisenhauer) vs the Puritan Anglo-Texan Johnson.
2) The German-Texan Ron Paul vs the Puritan Anglo-Texan George W. Bush.
Both Eisenhower and Paul were, and are, rebels against the entrenched East-Coast Anglo power elite who built the centralized institutions that now comprise the centres of Power of modern America.
German (Mid-Western) America (Eisenhower family origins), it seems to me, can trace their ideological foundations to the traditional family farm and homogenous Lutheran community. The Anglo-Americans, it seems to me, trace their foundations to the puritans (LBJ) and cosmopolitan East-Coast.
The former might have a natural inclination towards homogeneity, decentralization, live and let live and the family business. The latter, it seems to me, have a natural inclination towards ideology, non-homogeneity, and centralization.
I want to be clear that my definition of ‘Anglo’ refers specifically to culturally puritan/secular-puritan, East-Coast derived America. I no longer believe it would be apt to include Anglo-British under this definition despite multiple possible examples that would fit the description. E.g. Winston Churchill who, not incidentally, was indeed half a New Yorker.
As far as I am concerned the Anglo-America is the fifth column within Western Civilization.
— Aaron Kahland
RE-UNITE GERMAN AND ANGLO GERMANIC CIVILIZATIONS : By re-nationalizing liberalism.
Source date (UTC): 2014-11-18 06:30:00 UTC
Leave a Reply