The contrary position is that all works that are individually reproducible are s

The contrary position is that all works that are individually reproducible are subsidized for no particular reason whatsoever, and that this contributes substantially to the declining quality (capital content) of the arts over the century. In other words, why do we subsidize it?


Source date (UTC): 2019-12-14 18:12:52 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205913562532716544

Reply addressees: @waspuppet @paulkrugman

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205903897237295106


IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205903897237295106

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *