SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT INTERVENE AND MAKE ME A FORTUNE 500 CEO?
Feminists are absurd. Now, here is the data. CEO’s of large companies are (a) really smart, and (b) tall. Now, there is a correlation between height and brain size which correlates with intelligence. But also, the very primitive power that superior height conveys is tangible, and measurable.
Does that mean that the government should redistribute CEO positions from tall people to short people?
Then why should we redistribute CEO positions (or any position in society) from socially superior people to socially inferior people?
I have no problem with the fact that I can never play basketball well, and that in both soccer and volleyball I am working at a disadvantage. I have no problem that in business I am working at a disadvantage. I have no problem that even in the pursuit of desirable women that I am at a disadvantage. These are disadvantages. But I cannot comprehend wanting others to sacrifice the maximum that they can achieve in life to compensate for my disadvantage.
Yet feminists will argue the opposite day in and day out. The fact is that women work fewer hours, are less willing to make economic sacrifices, less willing to take economic risks, are less loyal to internal political networks, and are vastly outnumbered at both the top and bottom of the intelligence and aggressive impulsivity scales.
Just as I cannot possibly sense but 1/100’th of what an average women can about any other human being she encounters in the first fifteen seconds, I understand that nearly all women on earth, cannot make political assessments in the same short time frame.
We are compatible. But we are not equal. And group competition requires we make the best use of our best, because everyone else is merely a commodity.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-20 05:13:00 UTC
Leave a Reply