(Interesting email exchanges with Jan Lester thanks to Lee C Waaks. I don’t thin

(Interesting email exchanges with Jan Lester thanks to Lee C Waaks. I don’t think it’s going to be fruitful, because really, it’s too much to ask of him to absorb that much content. But I think I understand his frame of reference well enough now. I just need to understand his definition of property that can be transgressed against. And then I can restate his central argument in propertarian language – and agree with him or not. Just confirms that what I’m doing is pretty awesome when you start to work with it, but for the paradigmatically obligated into the enlightenment fallacies and institutional academic philosophy, for other than a few it’s just too much. People just don’t study the full suite of philosophies of, politics, ethics, economics, law and computation and math. )