WHY? THE FALLACY OF NON AGGRESSION AS JUSTIFICATION. Why would you develop an et

WHY? THE FALLACY OF NON AGGRESSION AS JUSTIFICATION.

Why would you develop an ethics of non-aggression rather than an ethic of non-theft, for a philosophical framework that purports to reduce all right to property rights, for some reason other than legitimizing deception and forbidding retaliation for deception?

You see, cosmopolitanism is merely a philosophical framework for justificationism.