What Steve Sailer does, and what all conservatives tend to do, consciously or not, is falsify statements by tests of (a) operational possibility (b) distributions of ability (c) consequences over time, (d) Hyperbole or Kantian Imperative asking “What if everyone did that?”
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-12 01:28:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204936062981885952
Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204935420770947075
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Steve_Sailer Criteria for Scientific Claims
1-Categorical consistency
2-Logical (internal) consistency
3-Operational consistency (possibility)
4-Empirical consistency (correspondence)
5-Rational consistency (incentive)
6-Scope consistency (completeness)
If you can’t say HOW you can’t say TRUE
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204935420770947075
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Steve_Sailer Criteria for Scientific Claims
1-Categorical consistency
2-Logical (internal) consistency
3-Operational consistency (possibility)
4-Empirical consistency (correspondence)
5-Rational consistency (incentive)
6-Scope consistency (completeness)
If you can’t say HOW you can’t say TRUE
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204935420770947075
Leave a Reply