Proportionality vs Trust.
(note to self)
Haidt refers to the moral instinct against free riding as “proportionality”, because our instinct includes a prohibition against disproportionate reward and consumption.
In a family or polity, that might be a correct projection. But I see it as constraint on consumption similar to the control of alphas. I am not sure it is a question of trust necessary for cooperation.
Free riding affects trust – willingness to cooperate. Punishment for violation of trust. Criminal (violence theft), Unethical (fraud and deception), Immoral (externalization).
Overconsumption may be immoral, perhaps. A deprivation of the commons. I suspect that is a better answer than proportionality – which is incalculable.
Yes. That’s probably correct.
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-29 02:15:00 UTC
Leave a Reply