THE “ONE LAW” IS THE PROHIBITION ON DISCOUNTS. Private property is merely a tool

THE “ONE LAW” IS THE PROHIBITION ON DISCOUNTS.

Private property is merely a tool for the prohibition of discounts.

Eh… I’m the only one who gets it. But that’s the answer. we’ve been all caught up in promoting and defending private property against the state, but that’s been a distraction.

We must suppress all discounts, or at least, as many as possible by the organized use of violence, in order to expand the scope and value of the market.

If we expand the discounts to just cover violence theft and fraud, private property results. But that is PRIMITIVE private property.

If we expand the discounts to all forms of discount both public and private, we end up with HIGH TRUST PROPERTY.

Rothbard gave us PRIMITIVE private property, and propertarianism gives us HIGH TRUST private property.

Conservatives will tolerate and embrace high trust private property and I am very much convinced that at least for christian european libertarians, I can convince them that high trust private property is superior to rothbard’s primitive private property.

The difference is that we must use violence to suppress all discounts, and with that knowledge we see liberty in a completely different light: we must use force to implement high trust property rights at all times, and at every opportunity.

And conversely, we cannot possess high trust private property without the constant, vigilant use of organized violence to suppress discounts.

When all discounts are suppressed, individuals have no choice but to seek to serve others in the market.