7) the difference is we would hold the moral high ground because the policies in

7) the difference is we would hold the moral high ground because the policies in the constitution we recommend fix the injustices that cause the current crisis. If you see these proposals they are ‘impossibly good, an too good to refuse.” This would put the state in a box.


Source date (UTC): 2020-07-09 19:27:27 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281309008171880448

Reply addressees: @TheStat53322413

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281308458780893184


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@TheStat53322413 6) With a set of constitutional and policy proposals that offered right, center, and left practical results, by forcing necessary reforms, we thought we could get enough of the right to show up to deliver the demands, that we could start controlling the narrative as BLM/A etc do.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1281308458780893184

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *