Paradigmatic convergence to parsimony is demonstrable. We call it testimony. Which is what the sciences seek to replicate (operational language) – and the platonists seek circumvent. They must preserve pretense of knowledge – if only for self image. 😉 Which such prose exposes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:31:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184567579194593280
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184564251538542592
IN REPLY TO:
@MattPirkowski
@curtdoolittle Perhaps they mix what you perceive as colloquial and technical, but I have no reason to assume that we prima facie share those categorical boundaries.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184564251538542592
Leave a Reply