In other words, they’re correct. The problem is the directness of their solution dependent on the frailty of human character, rather than architecting a system of rules and incentives that create markets for punishment as well as markets for rewards.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 18:55:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179107484881113088
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179107483765358593
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I think the NS ought to stick to the science: (a) they have a higher disgust response (purity), (b) higher sensitivity to capital(genetic), parasitism, risk (ir-reciprocity) (c) a higher demand for loyalty and hierarchy(order) in defense of purity, capital, order: natural law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179107483765358593
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
I think the NS ought to stick to the science: (a) they have a higher disgust response (purity), (b) higher sensitivity to capital(genetic), parasitism, risk (ir-reciprocity) (c) a higher demand for loyalty and hierarchy(order) in defense of purity, capital, order: natural law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179107483765358593
Leave a Reply