Glad I stuck with it. Yes you are on the right track. Too close to postmodernism, and that’s where I kept thinking you would go. Last point is that yes, we model the world as actionable objects, spaces, boundaries and locations at our body’s scale (a triangle in a hexagon).
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 06:43:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173487516416118784
Reply addressees: @Semiogogue
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173486004512145410
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Semiogogue 19) Yes, so better to leave behind the philosophy (pseudoscience) and just work within the scientific paradigm that universally converges on one paradigm. 20) very easy to convert this speech into scientific speech and the underlying neurology.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173486004512145410
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Semiogogue 19) Yes, so better to leave behind the philosophy (pseudoscience) and just work within the scientific paradigm that universally converges on one paradigm. 20) very easy to convert this speech into scientific speech and the underlying neurology.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173486004512145410
Leave a Reply