You can claim that Stefan didn’t produce a durable work of philosophy – and that would be true (Zizek either). And that it is difficult to disambiguate from self help (wisdom) rather than decidability (truth). But he practices the grammar of philosophy, and has produced a work.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:26:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167096174597292032
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Critique). And it’s unlikely that the others you mentioned know the difference. Peterson practices science but relies on suggestion using wisdom lit rather than operationalism. Borderline theology.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Critique). And it’s unlikely that the others you mentioned know the difference. Peterson practices science but relies on suggestion using wisdom lit rather than operationalism. Borderline theology.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
Leave a Reply