The color of one’s skin does not serve as rhetorical camouflage, from which to i

The color of one’s skin does not serve as rhetorical camouflage, from which to issue Hate Speech (Yes, you Roseanne) under pretense of virtue signals.


Source date (UTC): 2019-08-08 01:29:45 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159275470287966209

Reply addressees: @RoArquette

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159274578126016512


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@RoArquette So, to pose the rude question of the day, as to drive home the point:

—“If the Ashkenazim are White then was the Holocaust White genocide?”—

(The Cake Shall Not Be Eaten Twice.)

Disambiguation of conflationary deceits, is the means of falsifying Pilpul and Critique.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1159274578126016512


IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@RoArquette So, to pose the rude question of the day, as to drive home the point:

—“If the Ashkenazim are White then was the Holocaust White genocide?”—

(The Cake Shall Not Be Eaten Twice.)

Disambiguation of conflationary deceits, is the means of falsifying Pilpul and Critique.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1159274578126016512

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *