then you don’t know what the F* you’re talking about. Secondly, if you can’t say

…then you don’t know what the F* you’re talking about.
Secondly, if you can’t say what you aren’t measuring (in his case, available opportunities under the population curve) then you don’t know what you’re talking about. He doesn’t do either. He doesn’t know what he’s saying.


Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 19:57:54 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155930469004804096

Reply addressees: @clairlemon

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155930112115609600


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@clairlemon He tells people that they’re idiots or inummerate in reductive use of correlations. Conversely, if you can’t operationalize it you don’t understand it. In other words, if you can’t via-positiva construct a demonstrated behavior and via-negativa statistically define its limits …

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155930112115609600


IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@clairlemon He tells people that they’re idiots or inummerate in reductive use of correlations. Conversely, if you can’t operationalize it you don’t understand it. In other words, if you can’t via-positiva construct a demonstrated behavior and via-negativa statistically define its limits …

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155930112115609600

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *