So what do you have to trade instead of engaging in the straw man critique of “echo chamber” as an act of sophistry to distract from having nothing to exchange, or trying to ‘cheat’ them, when the only moral constraints that exist are those between cooperators not their enemies?
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 00:07:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154543609204682752
Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154542915399626752
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187 There are no political questions that cannot be answered by this simple question of ‘what do you have to trade?’. Conversely, any OTHER attempt is merely out of necessity an attempted act of lying, cheating, or fraud.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1154542915399626752
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187 There are no political questions that cannot be answered by this simple question of ‘what do you have to trade?’. Conversely, any OTHER attempt is merely out of necessity an attempted act of lying, cheating, or fraud.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1154542915399626752
Leave a Reply