Your response begins in the right direction but wanders into ambiguity where precision is needed.
Corrective Violence vs Soft Harm: You assert that “corrective violence hasn’t ever worked in this regard.” That’s historically false. In small-group settings, corrective violence was both deterrent and restitution. What has not worked is the institutionalization of corrective violence at scale without decidability—leading to either tyranny or passivity. Natural Law distinguishes between hard harms (actionable) and soft harms (non-actionable unless made decidable by measurement of cost to demonstrated interests). You’re halfway there, but missing the key: soft harms can be measured if we have a system of measurement.
Soft Harm is Compoundable: Yes. And Natural Law treats that compoundability as a form of fraud when the cost is externalized over time or across others without consent. Gossip, moralizing, shaming, undermining—these are acts of uninsured imposition.
The Gossip Creep: You mention “creeping gossip.” That’s GSRRM: Gossip, Shaming, Rallying, Ridicule, and Moralizing. It is a feminine reproductive strategy of social coercion that historically required regulation by norms or by corrective sanction. The failure to regulate it—through tradition, religion, or law—has led to institutional capture by this mode of influence.
Decidability is the Answer: Natural Law does not advocate a return to casual violence. It advocates decidability. If the harm is real, demonstrate it. If it is measurable, insure against it. If it is fictional, discard it. Decidability replaces both the superstitions of theology and the seductions of ideology.
The Problem is Not Female Inclusion—It’s Lack of Measurement: Inclusion itself is not the root cause. The problem is failing to measure and price the externalities created by different strategies of influence. We stopped punishing soft harms without replacing punishment with cost-accounting. That’s a system failure. Natural Law corrects that failure by restoring measurement of all impositions on demonstrated interests.
Reply addressees: @Archaic3one
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-08 03:19:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920317545263083523
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920316667936096506
Leave a Reply