Um… Do you know to whom you speak? 😉 I can address this issue as well as any

Um… Do you know to whom you speak? 😉
I can address this issue as well as any constitutional scholar. This topic constitutes the departmentalist vs judicial supremacist debate The net is that in the absence of a monarchy (under which the modern state was designed by England), the division of powers has no judge of last resort – as does (at least legally) England. Secondly, The court is not sovereign in matters of defense – the executive is. And the rights of non citizens is a postwar contrivance the west adopted in order to accomodate the problem of displaced european peoples.

“Read a book”. FFS… lol.

Reply addressees: @lisavibes123 @cenkuygur


Source date (UTC): 2025-04-26 00:01:12 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1915919050804498435

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1915908379958251829

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *