BANS ON TIKTOK, ONLYFANS, PORNHUB: Bans on Undermining Familial, Social, Politic

BANS ON TIKTOK, ONLYFANS, PORNHUB:
Bans on Undermining Familial, Social, Political Internal Production of Concurrency and Settlement by Suppression of Suggestion Instead of Facilitation of Debate by Free Speech

—“I would argue that PornHub and OnlyFans are a bigger threat to the American family than TikTok, however their owners are safe from interference of the US government.”–@calabrianvice

The purpose of freedom of speech is the preservation of the sovereignty of the people, both individually and collectively, necessary for self government under natural law (neutral), commonality in law (negativa), and concurrency in legislation (positiva).

However as I have tried to emphasize of late, there is a difference between Truthful (Testifiable), Reciprocal(Ethical/Moral), Speech that Seeks to Understand, and facilitate the production of Settlement by Concurrency, and thus preserves the sovereignty of all, versus suggestion and manipulation that seek to deceive and deny commensurability, understanding, and capacity for Settlement by Concurrency.

(Note: there is more political science in that paragraph than in all the volumes on the greco-roman, germanic, anglo american evolution of our civilization, government and law.)

I think we would agree when we discuss the family and as a consequence ‘society’ (where the purpose of the commons is the raising of family, and not the maximization of individual consumptive hedonism), but that the treat to the political capacity and concurrency of the citizenry in democratic polities given the public’s suggestibility by manipulation and in particular undermining and trust destruction.

Affections
CD

PS: If you don’t share these things I produce for our people to understand their predicament, then you’re not helping to solve the problem. ;). -hugs.

Reply addressees: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS