Yes, well, I’d happily take the debate. The question is what is the subject of i

Yes, well, I’d happily take the debate. The question is what is the subject of it? His conclusion that valence is utilitarian for a given morphology and biological complexity – which is absurdly obvious. Or his conclusion of the primacy of experience over existence which is nonsense – and even more mathematically simulable given marginal indifferences in action for everything with a neuron. Plato and his forms were childish. This is even more so.

Reply addressees: @MichaelADominy1 @drawveloper