SO enforcing cooperation is still cooperation. Eradicating them is a cost benefi

SO enforcing cooperation is still cooperation.
Eradicating them is a cost benefit trade off.
Again, I am having trouble understanding why you can’t separate decidability as a measure and applied decidabilty as a choice. I mean. I just can’t grasp why this is so difficult. Is it a linguistic or cultural matter or is it just that I have spent so much time on logics and decidabilty that I can’t see the difficulty in it.
I still can’t get around the intuition that you think this is philosophy (choice) rahter than science (decidability) that informs choice and prevents lying in making choices.

Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS