Q: DOES SCIENCE CONVERGE? Well, we can and appear to be consistent in discovery

Q: DOES SCIENCE CONVERGE?
Well, we can and appear to be consistent in discovery of rules (laws) of marginal indifference at increasing precision. That said, given there is only one fundamental rule to the universe, and all else is emergence from it, we may never know all that can be known, but we very likely can know all the fundamental rules from which emergence evolves. This can be said in contemporary terms: there is only so much predictable reducibility, and there is quite a bit of unpredictable irreducibility. On the flip side just as there are limits to the capacity of atoms to form, there is some absurd limit to their arrangement. And some even more absurd limit to what we can do with them if we can discover means of capturing and transforming energy to do so.
So that which is reducible to first principles of marginal indifference depends upon the field of permutations possible at each scale before the emergence of new potential permutations. This means many ‘sciences’ are forever limited in predictive power. That does not mean they are limited in explanatory power.

Reply addressees: @SpanishBaptist