“DELEGATING THINKING TO AIs” Hmm… Delegating searching is one thing. Delegatin

“DELEGATING THINKING TO AIs”
Hmm… Delegating searching is one thing. Delegating thinking is quite another. You’re right. I’ve spent a lot of my life on scientific epistemology and epistemic testifiability. So I find holes in papers and arguments with ease. I have found that the AIs are pretty good at “de-fluffing” the abstracts and contents of papers. And the number of errors I find, both in such processes and in its interpretation of my own work that I see consistent progress.
And, well, AIs are still in their early development and not quite into their adolescence and certainly far from their maturity. I’ve explained the constitution of that eventual hierarchy and what must be achieved to produce it. I’m not concerned yet because I am pretty confident competition will do its job, and suppress the worse AIs and reinforce the best AIs.
My only real concern is the economics of this evolutionary competition. If the economics fail before we achieve maturity then we should expect a proliferation of bad AIs that support biases and deceits rather than truths.

Reply addressees: @templexaciounes